This article is part of the network’s archive of useful research information. This article is closed to new comments due to inactivity. We welcome new content which can be done by submitting an article for review or take part in discussions in an open topic or submit a blog post to take your discussions online.

Improving maternal and child nutrition in resource-poor settings requires effective use of limited resources, but priority-setting is constrained by limited information about program costs and impacts, especially for interventions designed to improve diet quality. This study utilized a mixed methods approach to identify, describe and estimate the potential costs and impacts on child dietary intake of 12 nutrition-sensitive programs in Ethiopia, Nigeria and India. Findings suggest that existing evidence on cost-effectiveness for nutrition improvement focuses on interventions to address specific diseases. Future work using these data will analyse net cost-effectiveness.

https://academic.oup.com/heapol/advance-article/doi/10.1093/heapol/czy013/4924350?rss=1&utm_source=MHTF+Subscribers&utm_campaign=5e1828b43c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_03_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8ac9c53ad4-5e1828b43c-183804741

References

  1. Ayele Z, Peacock C. 2003. Improving access to and consumption of animal source foods in rural households: the experiences of a women-focused goat development program in the highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Nutrition
    133 : 3981S –6S.

  2. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Lancet Nutrition Interventions Review Group, Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group
    et al. 2013. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet 382 : 452 –77.

  3. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Maternal, Group, C.U.S., others et al. 2008. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. The Lancet 371: 243–60.